SUSTAIN-2: Impact study of the European Social Survey

Erscheinungsdatum: 14 März 2022 | Sprache der Studie: EN

This report presents the findings of the second impact study of the European Social Survey (ESS) ERIC. It is a follow-up to the original impact study of the ESS, which was conducted in 2016/17.

This study was commissioned by the ESS ERIC and conducted by Technopolis, with bibliometric analysis from the centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) at the University of Leiden. The study was funded under the European Commission Horizon2020 grant SUSTAIN-2 (reference 871063).

The purpose of this study is to identify the academic, non-academic and teaching impacts of the ESS. We note below our headline conclusions in brief.

User numbers and trends

Teaching impacts and institutional hotspots

The ESS is being used increasingly widely as a teaching tool, featuring across participating countries and in an increasing number of institutions for both methodological and thematic courses.

While overall ESS user numbers are strongly driven by users registering as students, the ‘true’ number of students using the ESS is likely higher than the ESS user data suggests, as many lecturers may download ESS data and convert the data into materials for their students, who themselves never actually register with the ESS. Nevertheless, ESS user data provide a useful proxy to identify teaching hotspots:

Academic impacts

The ESS continues to be viewed positively for its exceptionally high methodological standards. Even in direct contrast to other national and international social values and attitudes surveys, the ESS continues to be viewed as a gold standard.

Various measures we have taken suggest that the overall volume of ESS-based publication output has increased by at least 150% since the first ESS impact study of 2016/17. Including various different publication types and non-English language publications, data collected by staff at the University of Ljubljana suggest that there are over 7,500 ESS-based publications in existence (equivalent figure in the first impact study was 2,704). CWTS was able to identify 2,448 ESS-based items listed on Web of Science, which compares to around 1,000 in a similar analysis conducted in 2016.

Drawing on the 2,448 ESS-based items listed on Web of Science, bibliometric analysis performed by CWTS yields the following findings:

Non-academic impacts

Our research could not identify a meaningful way of quantifying the non-academic impacts of a research infrastructure such as the ESS. However, our country-level research yielded many examples of non-academic impacts of many different types and across different domains. These take many different shapes, including

To better understand outreach and the ESS’s presence on social media, we conducted a social media analysis, which yielded the following main findings: